From Diseases to Behaviors: A New Way of Looking at Health

What is the leading cause of death in the United States?

Heart disease?

Cancer?

Smoking.

Smoking? Yes, depending on how you ask the question.

In the early 90s, McGinnis and Foege turned the age-old question of what people die of on its head by asking not what diseases people die of but rather what the causes of these are. Instead of chalking up the death of an older man to say lung cancer, they sought to understand the proximate cause of death, which in the case of lung cancer is largely smoking. Using published data, the researchers performed a simple but profound calculation — they multiplied the mortality rates of leading diseases by the cause-attributable fraction, that proportion of a disease that can be attributed to a particular cause (for example, in lung cancer 90 percent of deaths in men and 80 percent of deaths in women are attributable to smoking). Published in JAMA in 1993, their landmark study became a call to action for the public health community.

When looked at the conventional way the top 10 causes of death in America are represented in the top graph below (this is data from the 2004 update of the original study). Viewed this way heart disease, cancer, and stroke are the leading causes of death, respectively. This accounting may help us understand the nation’s burden of illness, but does little to tell us how to prevent these diseases and improve health. Through the lens of McGinnis and Foege, we get the bottom graph, which shows the top 10 causes of actual death (e.g., the major external modifiable factors that contribute to death). This analysis shows that the number 1 cause of death in America is tobacco use, followed closely by poor diet and physical activity, and then alcohol consumption.

For those of passionate about preventive health, we take heart that fully 6 of the 10 leading actual causes of death are controllable behaviors — all except microbial agents, toxic agents, motor vehicle, and firearms (though hand washing and seat belts can make a huge difference!) — and that 4 of the 10 are addressed by U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommended clinical preventive services.

You may wonder why am I presenting the results of a 7-year-old study that is itself an update of a paper published 18 years ago.  Two weeks ago, I attended the American College of Preventive Medicine annual scientific session. Along with hundreds of my peers, I went to the conference excited to hear about the latest and greatest in preventive medicine. At highly anticipated keynote address, the opening speaker David Katz presented the first of what would be hundreds of slides of data shown throughout the three-day conference. And what did he kick off the conference with? The graphs above showing the top 10 actual causes of death in America.

Often when it comes to health it is hard to separate the signal from the noise. We get so many messages through the media, our social networks, and even our doctors. “Heart disease is the number 1 killer,” “Eat more omega-3,” “Don’t forget to check your breasts.” There are only so many hours in the day and so many competing agendas, it is hard to know what to make a priority. Sometimes to sort it all out it helps to just step back and let the data speak for itself.

So the question is: what does the data say to you?

- Shantanu Nundy, M.D.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Ping.fm
  • RSS
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

About admin

I'm a medical resident interested broadly in health care delivery, both domestically and globally, and preventive health care. My primary responsibilities are taking care of patients in the hospital and in a general medicine clinic. I also write about preventive health through my blog, www.beyondapples.org, and do research in health care delivery.
This entry was posted in Thinking Out Loud and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to From Diseases to Behaviors: A New Way of Looking at Health

  1. Mark says:

    Just to let you know, .tiff images do not display on any mainstream web browsers.

  2. admin says:

    Thanks for letting me know! I changed the image now as .bmp.

  3. I think you make a very good point that one’s perception of the problem depends upon how the data is presented and that if the effort and money were concentrated upon what is preventable in terms of maintaining overall health as opposed to disease specific mortality then perhaps there would be a wiser expenditure of money and effort. For instance, it is amazing what the benefits of moderate exercise are in terms of heart health, brain health, immune function, endocrine health, etc.

  4. Fisher Qua says:

    One of the things we’ve tried to do at the Healthiest State in the Nation Campaign is organize these specific issues into broad action areas. There are six we focus on:

    - Avoiding Addictions
    - Investing in Prevention
    - Promoting Community Health
    - Protecting against Injury and Disease
    - Engaging in Healthy Habits
    - Increasing Value of Health Services

    These are things that we can do individually AND collectively to improve the health of our state and nation. The important component of the action areas is that it begins to eliminate the competing priorities – anything you do to Invest in Prevention is helpful. Our measures in each of the action areas correlate to things like Receipt of Proven Clinical Preventive Services or Seat-belt Use to further reinforce how practical it really is to make a difference. Thank you for bringing attention to that underlying tension in the public health world.

  5. As a heart attack survivor, I really like this perspective. I’ve been gobsmacked to see cardiac patients leaving our Heart Institute – and still smoking. This must be supremely distressing to the nurses and docs who’ve just squished their blockages, burned their rogue electrical circuits and implanted lifesaving devices to help them survive.

    And as LA Cardiologist says, so many of the factors on the second list have multiplier effects on reducing factors on the first.

    Thanks for this!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>