<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Woman With A Mass In Her Kidney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://beyondapples.org/2009/07/06/the-woman-with-a-mass-in-her-kidney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://beyondapples.org/2009/07/06/the-woman-with-a-mass-in-her-kidney/</link>
	<description>Better ways to keep the doctor away</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 20:54:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Getting routine mammograms is not always an obvious choice &#124; BeyondApples.Org</title>
		<link>http://beyondapples.org/2009/07/06/the-woman-with-a-mass-in-her-kidney/comment-page-1/#comment-3126</link>
		<dc:creator>Getting routine mammograms is not always an obvious choice &#124; BeyondApples.Org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beyondapples.org/?p=349#comment-3126</guid>
		<description>[...] refers to cancers that will never cause harm if untreated. As I discussed in a recent blog entry (http://beyondapples.org/2009/07/06/the-woman-with-a-mass-in-her-kidney/), cancer often solicits a knee-jerk, &#8220;get this thing out of me!&#8221; response. But the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] refers to cancers that will never cause harm if untreated. As I discussed in a recent blog entry (<a href="http://beyondapples.org/2009/07/06/the-woman-with-a-mass-in-her-kidney/" rel="nofollow">http://beyondapples.org/2009/07/06/the-woman-with-a-mass-in-her-kidney/</a>), cancer often solicits a knee-jerk, &#8220;get this thing out of me!&#8221; response. But the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RRT</title>
		<link>http://beyondapples.org/2009/07/06/the-woman-with-a-mass-in-her-kidney/comment-page-1/#comment-3070</link>
		<dc:creator>RRT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beyondapples.org/?p=349#comment-3070</guid>
		<description>Very interesting. I had not thought of screening in this way, but I do find myself agreeing -- in part. I think that it likely will hold true for certain risks/diseases but (and I will point out here that I have very limited knowledge), I would think that for something like ovarian cancer, where diagnosis at an earlier stage results in a dramatic increase in survival rates, screening, even if it shows other, less substantial problems, might be worthwhile? Regardless, thinking one-step ahead is valuable in all situations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting. I had not thought of screening in this way, but I do find myself agreeing &#8212; in part. I think that it likely will hold true for certain risks/diseases but (and I will point out here that I have very limited knowledge), I would think that for something like ovarian cancer, where diagnosis at an earlier stage results in a dramatic increase in survival rates, screening, even if it shows other, less substantial problems, might be worthwhile? Regardless, thinking one-step ahead is valuable in all situations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

